Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-24 13:46:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71EEB484BDC3772BAD6DCE4E16C63C47050A52F6E75B158805CFEA5ABE2C4269
Participant Details

Original Note:

Richard Dawkins is wrong when he says all X0 people are female and all XXY are male. Biology is more diverse than some can apparently acknowledge Here is an example of an XO male person: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/505597 Here is an example of an XXY female person: https://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)79762-2/abstract

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770495991965204554
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71EEB484BDC3772BAD6DCE4E16C63C47050A52F6E75B158805CFEA5ABE2C4269
  • createdAtMillis - 1711288010910
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 177049599196520455471EEB484BDC3772BAD6DCE4E16C63C47050A52F6E75B158805CFEA5ABE2C4269