Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-27 17:19:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 62E7AFDA08987EA8BD71CB5B3511B4F25E0E392D0FA2E21358961942FF2B2501
Participant Details

Original Note:

Richard Dawkins is wrong when he says all X0 people are female and all XXY are male. Biology is more diverse than some can apparently acknowledge Here is an example of an XO male person: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/505597 Here is an example of an XXY female person: https://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)79762-2/abstract

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770495991965204554
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 62E7AFDA08987EA8BD71CB5B3511B4F25E0E392D0FA2E21358961942FF2B2501
  • createdAtMillis - 1714238342566
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 177049599196520455462E7AFDA08987EA8BD71CB5B3511B4F25E0E392D0FA2E21358961942FF2B2501