Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-21 12:29:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not clear if this is reducing standards because everyone that passes a test is not necessarily a good lawyer but good at memorizing and taking tests. The options proposed are practical experience as an alternative : https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/washington-adopts-new-lawyer-licensing-paths-other-states-mull-bar-exam-bypasses-2024-03-18/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1770484231342342376
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D
createdAtMillis - 1711024170008
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 17704842313423423760A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D