Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-20 21:09:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FCF71787C19F6C45ED673372CD3469351C26003C8F44E51234E0BE4A19FC74FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota es una nota a investigadores que hablan de estudios. No se puede contradecir con "no está indicado para", ya que las investigaciones llevan años para convertirse en indicaciones de la OMS o el ministerio de salud. Mucho menos se puede con esas fuentes. ¿chequeado?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770458635597979771
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FCF71787C19F6C45ED673372CD3469351C26003C8F44E51234E0BE4A19FC74FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1710968963793
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1770458635597979771FCF71787C19F6C45ED673372CD3469351C26003C8F44E51234E0BE4A19FC74FF