Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-20 19:49:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0295989D3195FA77BD85C246CE3FE951A4A22A0AA4159FD38AF31DAD9E8FA69D
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota es una nota a investigadores que hablan de estudios. No se puede contradecir con "no está indicado para", ya que las investigaciones llevan años para convertirse en indicaciones de la OMS o el ministerio de salud. Mucho menos se puede con esas fuentes. ¿chequeado?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770458635597979771
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0295989D3195FA77BD85C246CE3FE951A4A22A0AA4159FD38AF31DAD9E8FA69D
  • createdAtMillis - 1710964150240
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17704586355979797710295989D3195FA77BD85C246CE3FE951A4A22A0AA4159FD38AF31DAD9E8FA69D