Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-21 05:15:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F54239BFB1B43018B5E318F5131A40E200214EF7497BE4DE12B1F8991988D015
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Cry-harder crypto bros can use the comments section to say odd things. Plenty of peer reviewed academic (as in true) evidence here, backing up the post: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102394 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-18686-8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770262030898831694
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F54239BFB1B43018B5E318F5131A40E200214EF7497BE4DE12B1F8991988D015
  • createdAtMillis - 1710998111012
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1770262030898831694F54239BFB1B43018B5E318F5131A40E200214EF7497BE4DE12B1F8991988D015