Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-20 06:12:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A81792FC48382BB9237BA4BB58F437A3BF001CCCB2FFC0991F50AE6DBD648EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Cry-harder crypto bros can use the comments section to say odd things. Plenty of peer reviewed academic (as in true) evidence here, backing up the post: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102394 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-18686-8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770262030898831694
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A81792FC48382BB9237BA4BB58F437A3BF001CCCB2FFC0991F50AE6DBD648EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1710915150355
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17702620308988316945A81792FC48382BB9237BA4BB58F437A3BF001CCCB2FFC0991F50AE6DBD648EE