Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-20 02:25:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 51A209A9815F2C251A86434854F348C892EFC0C4B29AF553107134168E3B3DAC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Cry-harder crypto bros can use the comments section to say odd things. Plenty of peer reviewed academic (as in true) evidence here, backing up the post: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102394 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-18686-8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770262030898831694
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 51A209A9815F2C251A86434854F348C892EFC0C4B29AF553107134168E3B3DAC
  • createdAtMillis - 1710901539825
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177026203089883169451A209A9815F2C251A86434854F348C892EFC0C4B29AF553107134168E3B3DAC