Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-20 04:08:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B8B49E322D3221DCE16B07D9D2D4DD9690060565A32532339436B529597CF71
Participant Details

Original Note:

La candidata descalifica el resultado de la encuesta de Reforma por la tasa de rechazo de 45%, mientras que resalta como correcta la encuesta de Massive Caller que tiene una tasa de 95% de rechazo. Fuente: (pp. 4) https://www.massivecaller.com/files/presidenciables.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770250278639423545
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3B8B49E322D3221DCE16B07D9D2D4DD9690060565A32532339436B529597CF71
  • createdAtMillis - 1710907701173
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17702502786394235453B8B49E322D3221DCE16B07D9D2D4DD9690060565A32532339436B529597CF71