Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 22:31:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 621A16456951795BA7973EDB39CD004E0DA3181CC2536A46E4D9E8B49C5CE239
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article is full of errors. The Portuguese judgement was about habeas corpus and not the reliability of the tests. The judges did wrongly interpret Jaafar et al, which isn't about false positives at all https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7543373/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770173743777955910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 621A16456951795BA7973EDB39CD004E0DA3181CC2536A46E4D9E8B49C5CE239
  • createdAtMillis - 1710887489340
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1770173743777955910621A16456951795BA7973EDB39CD004E0DA3181CC2536A46E4D9E8B49C5CE239