Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-20 10:01:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDF085176F2923850737C270EB60D2A2093F5882D563FBC68FB910BE62CE50BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: CN users need to read the full study. The OP is factually correct. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-71548-z

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770143580214141000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DDF085176F2923850737C270EB60D2A2093F5882D563FBC68FB910BE62CE50BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1710928883075
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1770143580214141000DDF085176F2923850737C270EB60D2A2093F5882D563FBC68FB910BE62CE50BD