Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 18:25:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F866120F465449774A886C5E86F325CBD62DC4119FCF7C7F4870819C547F18D
Participant Details

Original Note:

“AI deblurring” tools infer plausible original images for blurred images by applying statistical models based on a large set of examples. They do not, however, reliably recover the original data lost due to the blur, and cannot be relied upon for investigative purposes. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.10700.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770103964731875572
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F866120F465449774A886C5E86F325CBD62DC4119FCF7C7F4870819C547F18D
  • createdAtMillis - 1710872755947
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17701039647318755729F866120F465449774A886C5E86F325CBD62DC4119FCF7C7F4870819C547F18D