Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-21 12:19:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A60797E4FC27367A63A742F6A7CF889D1FF1FC1285F3D997FD79F6BB502B23E
Participant Details

Original Note:

“AI deblurring” tools infer plausible original images for blurred images by applying statistical models based on a large set of examples. They do not, however, reliably recover the original data lost due to the blur, and cannot be relied upon for investigative purposes. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.10700.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770103964731875572
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7A60797E4FC27367A63A742F6A7CF889D1FF1FC1285F3D997FD79F6BB502B23E
  • createdAtMillis - 1711023589672
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17701039647318755727A60797E4FC27367A63A742F6A7CF889D1FF1FC1285F3D997FD79F6BB502B23E