Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 14:36:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 324A16C53881B6C6899109D3E9566F9C10C075F42D5DC12194726B2CDF4C77DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN La otra nota incluye un estudio cuyas conclusiones están ampliamente limitadas como ya se indica en el documento, no es en absoluto fiable, ni indicativo de lo que la nota afirma. https://behaviorandlawjournal.com/BLJ/article/view/86

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770069285592871220
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 324A16C53881B6C6899109D3E9566F9C10C075F42D5DC12194726B2CDF4C77DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1710858964098
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1770069285592871220324A16C53881B6C6899109D3E9566F9C10C075F42D5DC12194726B2CDF4C77DA