Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 14:03:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18744A0ED5156A8F58177BBE877E4B6D4D3ECEF8E262F4131334D51A4EA649F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN La otra nota incluye un estudio cuyas conclusiones están ampliamente limitadas como ya se indica en el documento, no es en absoluto fiable, ni indicativo de lo que la nota afirma. https://behaviorandlawjournal.com/BLJ/article/view/86

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770069285592871220
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18744A0ED5156A8F58177BBE877E4B6D4D3ECEF8E262F4131334D51A4EA649F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1710856988464
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177006928559287122018744A0ED5156A8F58177BBE877E4B6D4D3ECEF8E262F4131334D51A4EA649F7