Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 14:06:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BA5BA1F6E15024B77A0731A3FDC1F0E64518F1766B4C3DDAB116B26C300A61BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

At trial the judge found that Navarro failed to show that executive privilege was invoked in any way (he cannot 'assume' it) and further, Navarro refused to comply regarding elements not covered by possible privilege. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/06/peter-navarro-trial-contempt-of-congress-jan-6-trump

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769947300447580603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BA5BA1F6E15024B77A0731A3FDC1F0E64518F1766B4C3DDAB116B26C300A61BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1710857167443
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769947300447580603BA5BA1F6E15024B77A0731A3FDC1F0E64518F1766B4C3DDAB116B26C300A61BA