Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-20 05:59:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73246AC0CB1489D9096E1811694031C57D85C39285987982D2E7A2B0A4FE7A92
Participant Details

Original Note:

At trial the judge found that Navarro failed to show that executive privilege was invoked in any way (he cannot 'assume' it) and further, Navarro refused to comply regarding elements not covered by possible privilege. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/06/peter-navarro-trial-contempt-of-congress-jan-6-trump

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769947300447580603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73246AC0CB1489D9096E1811694031C57D85C39285987982D2E7A2B0A4FE7A92
  • createdAtMillis - 1710914379884
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176994730044758060373246AC0CB1489D9096E1811694031C57D85C39285987982D2E7A2B0A4FE7A92