Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 14:18:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6B3D363FE5A4A6410FE95AF7DB02DB5F83EB64C37321AB3F4618CD7630887EF7
Participant Details

Original Note:

At trial the judge found that Navarro failed to show that executive privilege was invoked in any way (he cannot 'assume' it) and further, Navarro refused to comply regarding elements not covered by possible privilege. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/06/peter-navarro-trial-contempt-of-congress-jan-6-trump

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769947300447580603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6B3D363FE5A4A6410FE95AF7DB02DB5F83EB64C37321AB3F4618CD7630887EF7
  • createdAtMillis - 1710857893872
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17699473004475806036B3D363FE5A4A6410FE95AF7DB02DB5F83EB64C37321AB3F4618CD7630887EF7