Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 12:41:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 338588D9A40ECC4EB54783AFA2601EB0DB7E5E1E77968620B444E46B0A54F691
Participant Details

Original Note:

At trial the judge found that Navarro failed to show that executive privilege was invoked in any way (he cannot 'assume' it) and further, Navarro refused to comply regarding elements not covered by possible privilege. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/06/peter-navarro-trial-contempt-of-congress-jan-6-trump

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769947300447580603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 338588D9A40ECC4EB54783AFA2601EB0DB7E5E1E77968620B444E46B0A54F691
  • createdAtMillis - 1710852108748
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1769947300447580603338588D9A40ECC4EB54783AFA2601EB0DB7E5E1E77968620B444E46B0A54F691