Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-20 06:55:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03AFDBC6CC1B5DF5DBF90929D89A0AF1C0290AC2418B8D4CCFA38AE1F471659C
Participant Details

Original Note:

At trial the judge found that Navarro failed to show that executive privilege was invoked in any way (he cannot 'assume' it) and further, Navarro refused to comply regarding elements not covered by possible privilege. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/06/peter-navarro-trial-contempt-of-congress-jan-6-trump

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769947300447580603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 03AFDBC6CC1B5DF5DBF90929D89A0AF1C0290AC2418B8D4CCFA38AE1F471659C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710917727943
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 176994730044758060303AFDBC6CC1B5DF5DBF90929D89A0AF1C0290AC2418B8D4CCFA38AE1F471659C