Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 02:59:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A8FB71F4EA8F994233201D3BD9B7D664C2B28990D6553702F15733F22D98FF5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Given the doctored photo previously provided, we should absolutely be questioning the veracity of this video. Stop worrying about NNN and worry about why the palace has been lying. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-appearances/the-royal-photo-that-was-too-good-to-be-true

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769910273366753636
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A8FB71F4EA8F994233201D3BD9B7D664C2B28990D6553702F15733F22D98FF5
  • createdAtMillis - 1710817179613
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17699102733667536364A8FB71F4EA8F994233201D3BD9B7D664C2B28990D6553702F15733F22D98FF5