Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 03:53:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The judge denied the motion without prejudice, stating specifically that Mr. Trump could make the motion again after further disclosure of evidence and legal argumentation has sharpened the legal issues of this case. Source in PN shows OP to be a reasonable interpretation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769895971042058266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D
  • createdAtMillis - 1710820402112
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769895971042058266F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D