Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 06:23:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A7A82C0407E75345AD7D93C1642776FA62A7186D7AB1B4C24802A2077020F4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The judge denied the motion without prejudice, stating specifically that Mr. Trump could make the motion again after further disclosure of evidence and legal argumentation has sharpened the legal issues of this case. Source in PN shows OP to be a reasonable interpretation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769895971042058266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A7A82C0407E75345AD7D93C1642776FA62A7186D7AB1B4C24802A2077020F4F
  • createdAtMillis - 1710829380129
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17698959710420582664A7A82C0407E75345AD7D93C1642776FA62A7186D7AB1B4C24802A2077020F4F