Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 15:11:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE3ACCD75C97ED7D4D57ACA404648304AFF579399C788D55F0CB9422A77D6298
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is factually correct. Google has claimed they have adjusted spam filters since then, but there is only a claim they are testing it, not independent research to see if their test worked. The ongoing court case has been found to have merit (RNC vs Google over this): https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/caedce/2:2022cv01904/418528/63

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769888552853397579
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE3ACCD75C97ED7D4D57ACA404648304AFF579399C788D55F0CB9422A77D6298
  • createdAtMillis - 1710861096515
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769888552853397579FE3ACCD75C97ED7D4D57ACA404648304AFF579399C788D55F0CB9422A77D6298