Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 20:11:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 805847E5E6DB9CCE99D3304C65A6C43E6BC027226EE379F79E6DE1750E9EBE7C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a false interpretation of the ruling. Judge Cannon rebuffed arguments by Trump’s lawyers that the Espionage Act was impermissibly vague and should be struck down. Cannon pointed out that "declaring a statute unconstitutionally vague is an extraordinary step." https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/f0ee3456be6a5fcf/06814efe-full.pdf https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-argues-dismiss-classified-documents-case/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769885136479256784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 805847E5E6DB9CCE99D3304C65A6C43E6BC027226EE379F79E6DE1750E9EBE7C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710879084857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1769885136479256784805847E5E6DB9CCE99D3304C65A6C43E6BC027226EE379F79E6DE1750E9EBE7C