Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 03:58:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6779E0AAD43619714067981E6F9DF2B436D141CED221F34FB770523E966D0259
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a false interpretation of the ruling. Judge Cannon rebuffed arguments by Trump’s lawyers that the Espionage Act was impermissibly vague and should be struck down. Cannon pointed out that "declaring a statute unconstitutionally vague is an extraordinary step." https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/f0ee3456be6a5fcf/06814efe-full.pdf https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-argues-dismiss-classified-documents-case/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769885136479256784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6779E0AAD43619714067981E6F9DF2B436D141CED221F34FB770523E966D0259
  • createdAtMillis - 1710820718014
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17698851364792567846779E0AAD43619714067981E6F9DF2B436D141CED221F34FB770523E966D0259