Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 01:15:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E49EFE59AF4E01C4E7194F588F304DA62D7F88A6733D95A8AE723EF0DF28EF15
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the article is biased the note is definitely biased the other way. If there is specifically something that needs to be called out, like the original actions of the company, then make that the note. Otherwise, this will just seem like an op-ed. Sorry bud.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769848491197788207
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E49EFE59AF4E01C4E7194F588F304DA62D7F88A6733D95A8AE723EF0DF28EF15
  • createdAtMillis - 1710810927787
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769848491197788207E49EFE59AF4E01C4E7194F588F304DA62D7F88A6733D95A8AE723EF0DF28EF15