Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 12:18:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE8383ADDD7CFF5C4134DD9E34DA238B6A10D4023D6E4714F741DDA099028F7C
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the article is biased the note is definitely biased the other way. If there is specifically something that needs to be called out, like the original actions of the company, then make that the note. Otherwise, this will just seem like an op-ed. Sorry bud.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769848491197788207
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE8383ADDD7CFF5C4134DD9E34DA238B6A10D4023D6E4714F741DDA099028F7C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710850712867
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769848491197788207CE8383ADDD7CFF5C4134DD9E34DA238B6A10D4023D6E4714F741DDA099028F7C