Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-18 22:27:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90B6279A79FB684D241B82B3241C506C7E643783C8AC0A32836E6C77336429AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the article is biased the note is definitely biased the other way. If there is specifically something that needs to be called out, like the original actions of the company, then make that the note. Otherwise, this will just seem like an op-ed. Sorry bud.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769848491197788207
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90B6279A79FB684D241B82B3241C506C7E643783C8AC0A32836E6C77336429AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1710800858650
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176984849119778820790B6279A79FB684D241B82B3241C506C7E643783C8AC0A32836E6C77336429AA