Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-18 22:31:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D6DC43EEB444A8F0E521AA4814AA15172BBA982A6CA9AD9A722EF2E1446F060
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the article is biased the note is definitely biased the other way. If there is specifically something that needs to be called out, like the original actions of the company, then make that the note. Otherwise, this will just seem like an op-ed. Sorry bud.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769848491197788207
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D6DC43EEB444A8F0E521AA4814AA15172BBA982A6CA9AD9A722EF2E1446F060
  • createdAtMillis - 1710801063029
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17698484911977882073D6DC43EEB444A8F0E521AA4814AA15172BBA982A6CA9AD9A722EF2E1446F060