Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 05:34:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B153949D7AF2EBCA8B96C848BB127F0A78FDFC76E33F95FF625C5E15382C904
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the article is biased the note is definitely biased the other way. If there is specifically something that needs to be called out, like the original actions of the company, then make that the note. Otherwise, this will just seem like an op-ed. Sorry bud.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769848491197788207
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B153949D7AF2EBCA8B96C848BB127F0A78FDFC76E33F95FF625C5E15382C904
  • createdAtMillis - 1710826456713
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17698484911977882071B153949D7AF2EBCA8B96C848BB127F0A78FDFC76E33F95FF625C5E15382C904