Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 02:41:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F394CC4B26E726AC80337D0BB9BFF42C02645C211F12615C073A89C5066C7CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Informar que o termo “banho de sangue” estava relacionado a indústria fez-se necessário uma vez que o post claramente relaciona as duas falas como complemento uma da outra. Não trata-se de opinião mas sim de contexto adicional necessário pois induz o leitor ao erro (clickbait) https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2024/03/18/trump-defends-bloodbath-comment-and-claims-critics-media-took-it-out-of-context/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769831820105765261
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F394CC4B26E726AC80337D0BB9BFF42C02645C211F12615C073A89C5066C7CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1710816108629
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17698318201057652611F394CC4B26E726AC80337D0BB9BFF42C02645C211F12615C073A89C5066C7CE