Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-18 18:43:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C63F552724A78E583BB251C42574AE0FC3FDE2F247D052260D45EBDA92C4A47
Participant Details

Original Note:

That is why the Supreme Court is hearing the case. Because the government tried to censure the flow of information to accommodate their narrative .

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769759815327252642
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C63F552724A78E583BB251C42574AE0FC3FDE2F247D052260D45EBDA92C4A47
  • createdAtMillis - 1710787433418
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17697598153272526423C63F552724A78E583BB251C42574AE0FC3FDE2F247D052260D45EBDA92C4A47