Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-18 23:27:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93F4708C5D4AF60B6821F571F0AFBB491A48776044B0A3E020252C04DE7EB521
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misinformatie is doen alsof er hevig gereageerd wordt op de eigen tweets met discussie en negativiteit. De juiste informatie is dat er eigenlijk zo goed als niet gereageerd wordt op tweet van het onbekende College van Rijksadviseurs. Oftewel deugen voor de buhne. https://x.com/rijks_adviseurs

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769714629561724976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93F4708C5D4AF60B6821F571F0AFBB491A48776044B0A3E020252C04DE7EB521
  • createdAtMillis - 1710804470112
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 176971462956172497693F4708C5D4AF60B6821F571F0AFBB491A48776044B0A3E020252C04DE7EB521