Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 10:53:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 533D3B9392192EBC7702DC3AFB09AE46C6FDECE42B35FAD9289C8AA35466A87C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misinformatie is doen alsof er hevig gereageerd wordt op de eigen tweets met discussie en negativiteit. De juiste informatie is dat er eigenlijk zo goed als niet gereageerd wordt op tweet van het onbekende College van Rijksadviseurs. Oftewel deugen voor de buhne. https://x.com/rijks_adviseurs

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769714629561724976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 533D3B9392192EBC7702DC3AFB09AE46C6FDECE42B35FAD9289C8AA35466A87C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710845586436
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769714629561724976533D3B9392192EBC7702DC3AFB09AE46C6FDECE42B35FAD9289C8AA35466A87C