Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-18 12:47:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB7544F1D813072D881DC8AE61C124531BA163527A5BEFAD4DD5BDA25A0D3D3C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article is misleading as the photographs do not correlate with the story. This goes against ipso editors code of practice “The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not supported by the text”. https://www.ipso.co.uk/editors-code-of-practice/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769646652879433780
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB7544F1D813072D881DC8AE61C124531BA163527A5BEFAD4DD5BDA25A0D3D3C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710766046921
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769646652879433780EB7544F1D813072D881DC8AE61C124531BA163527A5BEFAD4DD5BDA25A0D3D3C