Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-18 11:20:38 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA16FB7726BE9E7C167A0C8C98946EE32C320B4246054FEBA60BC10AEC2F1F0B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article is misleading as the photographs do not correlate with the story. This goes against ipso editors code of practice “The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not supported by the text”. https://www.ipso.co.uk/editors-code-of-practice/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769646652879433780
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EA16FB7726BE9E7C167A0C8C98946EE32C320B4246054FEBA60BC10AEC2F1F0B
  • createdAtMillis - 1710760838670
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769646652879433780EA16FB7726BE9E7C167A0C8C98946EE32C320B4246054FEBA60BC10AEC2F1F0B