Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-18 00:52:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F308D59CA7A1D3F821D71E160AEB038835C075F4A1798D40BBA37C822B3DCF20
Participant Details

Original Note:

裁判所実務、各省庁のデータを無視した 極めて恣意的な解釈がなされています。 また、共同親権の正しい理解もありません。 下記リンクより正しい共同親権の理念。 裁判所実務のデータを確認してください。 https://oyako-law.org/index.php?民間法制審議会家族法制部会 https://note.com/ishiitoshihiro1/n/n48320bbe9057

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769497419816087671
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F308D59CA7A1D3F821D71E160AEB038835C075F4A1798D40BBA37C822B3DCF20
  • createdAtMillis - 1710723123433
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1769497419816087671F308D59CA7A1D3F821D71E160AEB038835C075F4A1798D40BBA37C822B3DCF20