Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 13:44:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E11CA97FCDFDB1B81751B1A465EF17E65E7FC7BDAFC98B5738275E2521CB7E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

裁判所実務、各省庁のデータを無視した 極めて恣意的な解釈がなされています。 また、共同親権の正しい理解もありません。 下記リンクより正しい共同親権の理念。 裁判所実務のデータを確認してください。 https://oyako-law.org/index.php?民間法制審議会家族法制部会 https://note.com/ishiitoshihiro1/n/n48320bbe9057

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769497419816087671
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E11CA97FCDFDB1B81751B1A465EF17E65E7FC7BDAFC98B5738275E2521CB7E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1712929484436
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17694974198160876719E11CA97FCDFDB1B81751B1A465EF17E65E7FC7BDAFC98B5738275E2521CB7E4