Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 22:58:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE77B1E0E35CEE5A3325BE4B6E5C26B94844873C1D4AA470E9F6E5AD1DCAE5BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article does not mention the cost of the Rwanda plan, this is just an assumption based on no hard evidence https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c355971b-898d-4301-aff9-9aea31a10736

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769474746331128082
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE77B1E0E35CEE5A3325BE4B6E5C26B94844873C1D4AA470E9F6E5AD1DCAE5BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1710716288585
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769474746331128082EE77B1E0E35CEE5A3325BE4B6E5C26B94844873C1D4AA470E9F6E5AD1DCAE5BF