Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 21:48:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6C77F9D195CA8858BD12610E36BA73C842E34D950454F5C91C548DABD720D000
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article does not mention the cost of the Rwanda plan, this is just an assumption based on no hard evidence https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c355971b-898d-4301-aff9-9aea31a10736

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769474746331128082
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6C77F9D195CA8858BD12610E36BA73C842E34D950454F5C91C548DABD720D000
  • createdAtMillis - 1710712080150
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17694747463311280826C77F9D195CA8858BD12610E36BA73C842E34D950454F5C91C548DABD720D000