Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 22:56:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 579423F4E50D438AC024B5AF68035B220669BF586D3B25F7BC06EB483147B1D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article does not mention the cost of the Rwanda plan, this is just an assumption based on no hard evidence https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c355971b-898d-4301-aff9-9aea31a10736

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769474746331128082
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 579423F4E50D438AC024B5AF68035B220669BF586D3B25F7BC06EB483147B1D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1710716204607
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1769474746331128082579423F4E50D438AC024B5AF68035B220669BF586D3B25F7BC06EB483147B1D1