Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 17:45:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5F2361CD9DAA58AEED074D30A355A64A0C0007A26DFB94D5B474120D44894A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lior Pachter's critique only regards one of the figures shown in Wyner's article. Even so, it doesn't debunk the statistics, but offers criticism on the visual presentation itself

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769408363522060709
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5F2361CD9DAA58AEED074D30A355A64A0C0007A26DFB94D5B474120D44894A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1710697522119
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769408363522060709E5F2361CD9DAA58AEED074D30A355A64A0C0007A26DFB94D5B474120D44894A4