Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 21:04:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B72625BD61E6C71D451F17C3B3048F3AF2901F4107629B8888D2C4694176769C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lior Pachter's critique only regards one of the figures shown in Wyner's article. Even so, it doesn't debunk the statistics, but offers criticism on the visual presentation itself

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769408363522060709
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B72625BD61E6C71D451F17C3B3048F3AF2901F4107629B8888D2C4694176769C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710709485146
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769408363522060709B72625BD61E6C71D451F17C3B3048F3AF2901F4107629B8888D2C4694176769C