Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 23:27:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A612F0613E22C4D8D9FDF336906912F99385355BE35ACD2E201DF616C5705D99
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lior Pachter's critique only regards one of the figures shown in Wyner's article. Even so, it doesn't debunk the statistics, but offers criticism on the visual presentation itself

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769408363522060709
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A612F0613E22C4D8D9FDF336906912F99385355BE35ACD2E201DF616C5705D99
  • createdAtMillis - 1710718056557
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769408363522060709A612F0613E22C4D8D9FDF336906912F99385355BE35ACD2E201DF616C5705D99