Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 21:24:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F8E1835BE61191C0180283CE7505CD2780D7B55A5762C2A7A6DD660B964C7D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lior Pachter's critique only regards one of the figures shown in Wyner's article. Even so, it doesn't debunk the statistics, but offers criticism on the visual presentation itself

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769408363522060709
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F8E1835BE61191C0180283CE7505CD2780D7B55A5762C2A7A6DD660B964C7D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1711142657199
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17694083635220607093F8E1835BE61191C0180283CE7505CD2780D7B55A5762C2A7A6DD660B964C7D9