Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-18 13:06:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25F9B57DEFA6FF2C0B5F4CDECE03404C798F96849434AF485D76749A3C70A4A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lior Pachter's critique only regards one of the figures shown in Wyner's article. Even so, it doesn't debunk the statistics, but offers criticism on the visual presentation itself

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769408363522060709
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25F9B57DEFA6FF2C0B5F4CDECE03404C798F96849434AF485D76749A3C70A4A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1710767190922
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176940836352206070925F9B57DEFA6FF2C0B5F4CDECE03404C798F96849434AF485D76749A3C70A4A0