Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 18:26:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4D1A0DBBD8E553F1CD9B6C9CFA0D4B331C827998C1869E611157E20231A2786
Participant Details

Original Note:

Selbst wenn es im Artikel steht ist der Tweet irreführend, zudem werden die meisten Menschen den Artikel nicht aufrufen und lediglich den Tweet lesen. Quelle Presserat: https://www.presserat.de/presse-nachrichten-details/presserat-rügt-irreführende-überschriften-und-verletzungen-des-opferschutzes.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769391181215957284
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4D1A0DBBD8E553F1CD9B6C9CFA0D4B331C827998C1869E611157E20231A2786
  • createdAtMillis - 1710700014098
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769391181215957284E4D1A0DBBD8E553F1CD9B6C9CFA0D4B331C827998C1869E611157E20231A2786