Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 17:00:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 24A8D4FDAE6001E3CCF3651E37B56961995D67310BD012D2E52C012C46BB2CBF
Participant Details

Original Note:

El estudio ha comparado a dos grupos, sin datos sobre su CI antes del COVID, por lo tanto no podemos asumir que las diferencias entre el CI se deban al COVID y no a otras posibles circunstancias que han podido influir, incluido el azar en la selección de los participantes http://cv.uoc.edu/UOC/a/moduls/90/90_166d/web/main/m4/22f.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769374181504757810
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 24A8D4FDAE6001E3CCF3651E37B56961995D67310BD012D2E52C012C46BB2CBF
  • createdAtMillis - 1710694827946
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176937418150475781024A8D4FDAE6001E3CCF3651E37B56961995D67310BD012D2E52C012C46BB2CBF