Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 15:52:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E8ED42EEE27FAB4BC1824EB471A8DD442C10604DAE072B6806914CE250FECC7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study cited in this graphic states that it was "unable to survey non-English tweets" (page 6). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4227488 Twitter/X is blocked in China. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_Twitter#China

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769240727609815370
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E8ED42EEE27FAB4BC1824EB471A8DD442C10604DAE072B6806914CE250FECC7
  • createdAtMillis - 1710690748145
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17692407276098153708E8ED42EEE27FAB4BC1824EB471A8DD442C10604DAE072B6806914CE250FECC7